Abstinence is saying yes to the rest of your life.

 

 

 

Teen-Aid, Inc.

723 E. Jackson
Spokane, WA 99207
509-482-2868 information
800-357-2868 order

SIECUS E-Mail Alert—February 8, 2002

 

                    January Legislative Report

 

ARIZONA:  Medically Accurate Requirement; Parental Control

     On January 15th and 24th, House Bill (HB) 2117 and Senate Bill (SB)

1157, respectively, were introduced in the Arizona Legislature.  These

bills would require all school districts with existing sexuality

education curricula to provide “medically accurate” instruction.  The

bills define “medically accurate” as instruction which is consistent

with current public health data and the findings of the Centers for

Disease Control and Prevention.  Also, the bills specifically state that

myths regarding sexually transmitted infections should be dispelled and

that there should be no promotion of or discrimination between

particular legal and consensual activities.  Thus, the bills strike out

current law which states that homosexuality should not be promoted nor

should it be portrayed as a positive alternative lifestyle.

    On January 23rd, HB 2392 was introduced in the Arizona House of

Representatives.  This bill would require the Department of Education to

distribute a Parent’s Bill of Rights annually.  The first enumerated

right is the ability to remove one’s child out of his/her sexuality

education class.

 

IDAHO:  “Character-Based” Sexuality Education

    On January 7th, House Concurrent Resolution (HCR) 36 was introduced in

the Idaho Legislature.  The resolution recognizes “findings of the

legislature concerning character-based sex education as the ultimate

weapon in the war against another kind of ‘terrorism’.”  It maintains

that sexual activity outside of marriage and sexually transmitted

diseases cause enormous mental and physical suffering and cost billions

of dollars each year and that, therefore, sex education in public

schools should be “character-based.”  The resolution does not define the

term “character-based.”

 

MINNESOTA:  Marriage Promotion and Abstinence

    On January 29th, HB 2660, a bill that would add marriage promotion and

abstinence language to the state’s sexually transmitted diseases

education program, was introduced.  The bill would require that students

be taught “the value of marriage” and that abstinence is the “expected

standard for sexual behavior.”  Further, students would be taught that

sexual activity outside of marriage is likely to have harmful emotional,

physical, and social effects.

 

MISSISSIPPI:  Sexuality Education Requirement

    On January 21st, a bill, HB 1422, was introduced that would require

sexuality education be taught in all public schools no later than the

third grade.  Currently, Mississippi does not require that sexuality or

HIV/STD education be taught.  The bill requires only that the curriculum

be “developmentally age appropriate.”

 

VERMONT:  Sexuality Education Requirement

    On January 24th, H 619 was introduced in the Vermont legislature.  The

bill would require age-appropriate information about sexual behavior to

be fully integrated into curricula.  The bill also establishes a grant

program that would offer funding to school districts for qualified,

specially-trained professionals in the area of sexuality.

 

VIRGINIA:  Sexuality Education Gag Rule; Adoption Promotion

    On January 9th and 15th, HB 88 and HB 1206, respectively, were

introduced in the Virginia legislature.  These bills would amend the

state’s family life education provisions.  The first bill, HB 88,

prohibits presentations, classroom discussions, and delivery of

information regarding “crimes against nature” in any family life

education curriculum.  Virginia law defines oral and anal sex as crimes

against nature.  As discussed earlier today, this bill was passed out of

the House and has been referred to the Senate Education and Health

Committee.   The second bill, HB 1206, mandates that any family life

education curriculum provide instruction on the benefits of adoption as

the preferred choice in the event of an unintended pregnancy. 

 

WASHINGTON

:  Medically Accurate Requirement

    On January 18th and 21st, both chambers of the Washington legislature

introduced bills regarding medically accurate sexuality education

programs.  The bills, HB 2546 and SB 6506, would require that all

current sexuality and abstinence education programs be medically and

scientifically accurate.

 

Back to Fighting the Medical Accuracy Myth